From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 79
Page 102
There are two broad explanations, which we may call the psychological and the
economic. Psychologically, the division in society is caused by power and
indolence : the positive egoism of power in the rulers, the negative egoism of
indolence ...
There are two broad explanations, which we may call the psychological and the
economic. Psychologically, the division in society is caused by power and
indolence : the positive egoism of power in the rulers, the negative egoism of
indolence ...
Page 103
Economic forces do play an important part, and Marxism has been useful in
emphasising them. But without power and indolence, over and above mere
material need, the division could never have come about or been perpetuated.
There is no ...
Economic forces do play an important part, and Marxism has been useful in
emphasising them. But without power and indolence, over and above mere
material need, the division could never have come about or been perpetuated.
There is no ...
Page 113
The ideals opposite to these two evil forces , ideals which have always inspired
mankind , are peace and economic prosperity . In place of power and all its
factions we need peace and stability : in place of indolence , which perpetuates
dirt ...
The ideals opposite to these two evil forces , ideals which have always inspired
mankind , are peace and economic prosperity . In place of power and all its
factions we need peace and stability : in place of indolence , which perpetuates
dirt ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
JANUARY 1950 | 1 |
Britains Contribution to Her Own Food Supply | 10 |
Counting Britains Birds 2 | 31 |
110 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
appeared Army authority become believe bird breeding Britain British called capital cause cent century character Christian Church common Communist continued course early economic effect England English fact force foreign French German give given Government half hand human idea important increase industry interest Italy Labour later leaders least less letter limited living London Lord marriage matter means ment million mind Nationalist nature never officers party passed perhaps period political possible present Press problem production question reason recent regard remain result Russia schools seems Shaw shows social South success things thought tion to-day United University whole workers writing
Bibliographic information
| Title | The Quarterly Review, Volumes 288-289 |
| Contributors | William Gifford, Sir John Taylor Coleridge, John Gibson Lockhart, Whitwell Elwin, William Macpherson, William Smith, Sir John Murray (IV), Rowland Edmund Prothero (Baron Ernle), George Walter Prothero |
| Publisher | John Murray, 1950 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |