Page images
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]
[subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][merged small][subsumed][merged small][merged small]

CHAP. I.

-

- 108

CHAP. II.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

ibid.

[ocr errors][merged small]
[merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors]

SECT. II. The sacred war. Sequel of the history of Philip. He endeavours in vain

to possess himself of the pass of Thermopyla

SECT. III. Demosthenes, upon Philip's attempting Thermopyla, harangues the Athe-

nians, and animates them against that prince. Little regard is paid to his advice.

Olynthus, upon the point of being besieged by Philip, addresses the Athenians for

succour. Demosthenes endeavours by his orations to rouse them from their lethar-

gy. They send but a very weak succour, and Philip at length takes the place

SECT. IV. Philip declares in favour of Thebes against the Phocæans, and thereby en-

gages in the sacred war. He lulls the Athenians, notwithstanding the remonstrances

of Demosthenes, into security, by a pretended peace and false promises. He seizes

on Thermopylæ, subjects the Phocæans, and puts an end to the sacred war. He is

admitted into the council of the Amphictyons

294

SECT. V. Philip being returned to Macedonia, extends his conquests into Illyria and

Thrace. He projects a league with the Thebans, the Messenians, and the Argives,

to invade Peloponnesus in concert with them. Athens having declared in favour

of the Lacedæmonians, this league is dissolved. He again makes an attempt upon

Euboea, but Phocion drives him out of it. Character of that celebrated Athenian.

Philip besieges Perinthus and Byzantium. The Athenians, animated by the orations

of Deinosthenes, send succours to those two cities, under the command of Phocion,

who forces Philip to raise the siege of those places

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

314

326

THE

HISTORY

OF THE

PERSIANS AND GRECIANS.

BOOK IX. CONTINUED.

CHAPTER IV.

HISTORY OF SOCRATES ABRIDGED.

As the death of Socrates is one of the most considerable events of antiquity, I think it incumbent on me to treat that subject with all the extent it deserves. With this view I shall go somewhat back, in order to give the reader a just idea of this Prince of Philosophers.

Two authors will supply me principally with what I have to say upon the subject:-Plato and Xenophon, both disciples of Socrates. It is to them that posterity is indebted for many of his discourses (as that philosopher left nothing in writing,*) and for an ample account of all the circumstances of his condemnation and death. Plato was an eye-witness of the whole, and relates, in his Apology, the manner of Socrates' accusation and defence; in Crito, his refusal to make his escape out of prison; in his Phædon, his admirable discourse upon the immortality of the soul, which was immediately followed by his death. Xenophon was absent at that time, and upon his return to his native country, after the expedition of the younger Cyrus against his brother Artaxerxes: so that he wrote his Apology of Socrates only from the report of others; but his actions and discourses in his four books of memorable things, he repeats from his own knowledge. Diogenes Laertius has given us the life of Socrates, but in a very dry and abridged

manner.

Socrates, cujus ingenium variosque sermones immortalitati scriptis suis Plato tradidit literam nullam reliquit. Cic. de Orat. 1. iii. a. 57.

SECTION I.

Birth of Socrates. He applies at first to sculpture; then to the study of the sciences: his wonderful progress in them. His taste for moral philosophy: his manner of living, and sufferings from the ill humour of his wife.

A. M. 3533.

Socrates was born at Athens, in the fourth year of Ant. J. C. 471. the seventy-seventh Olympiad.* His father Sophroniscus was a sculptor, and his mother Phænarete a midwife. Hence we may observe, that meanness of birth is no obstacle to true merit, in which alone solid glory and real nobility consists. It appears from the comparisons which Socrates often used in his discourses, that he was neither ashamed of his father's nor mother's profession. He was surprised that a sculptor should employ his whole attention to fashion an insensible stone into the likeness of a man,† and that a man should take so little pains not to resemble an insensible stone. He would often say, that he exercised the function of midwife with regard to the mind, in making it bring forth all its thoughts; and this was indeed the peculiar talent of Socrates. He treated subjects in so simple, natural, and clear an order, that he made those with whom he disputed say what he wished, and find an answer themselves to all the questions he proposed to them. He at first learned his father's trade, in which he made himself very expert. In the time of Pausanias, there was a Mercury and the Graces still to be seen at Athens of his workmanship; and it is to be presumed, these statues would not have found a place among those of the greatest masters in the art, if they had not been thought worthy of it.

Crito is reported to have taken him out of his father's shop,|| from admiration of his fine genius, and the opinion he entertained that it was inconsistent for a young man, capable of the greatest things, to continue perpetually employed upon stone with a chisel in his hand. He was the disciple of Archelaus, who conceived a great affection for him. Archelaus had been pupil to Anaxagoras, a very celebrated philosopher. His first study was physics, the works of nature, and the motions of the heavens, stars, and planets, according to the custom of those times, wherein only that part of philosophy was known; and Xenophon assures us that he was very well acquainted with it. But after having found, by his own experience,** how difficult, abstruse, and intricate, and, at the same

*Diog. Lsert. in Socrat. p. 100. † Ibid. p. 110. Plat. in Theatet. p. 149, &c Paus. 1. ix. p. 596. || Diog. p. 101. T Lib. iv Memorab. p. 710. **Socrates primus philosophiam devocavit è cœlo, ut in urbibus collocavit, et in domos etiam introduxit, et coëgit de vitâ et moribus, rebusque bunis et malis quærere. Tusc. Quæst.1. v. n. 10.

Cic

Socrates mihi videtur, id quod constat inter omnes, primus à rebus occultis, et ab ipsâ naturâ involutis, in quibus omnes ante eum philosophi occupati fuerunt, avocavisse philosophiam, et ad vitam communem adduxisse; ut de virtutibus et vitiis, omninoque de bonis rebus et malis quereret; cœlestia autem vel procul esse à nostrà cognitione cense ret, vel si maximè cognita essent, nihil tamen ad bene vivendum conferre. Cic. Acad. Quæst. 1. i. n 15.

« PreviousContinue »