Leibniz and his Correspondents
Cambridge University Press, Apr 26, 2004 - Philosophy - 310 pages
Unlike most of the other great philosophers Leibniz never wrote a magnum opus, so his philosophical correspondence is essential for an understanding of his views. This collection of essays by pre-eminent figures in the field of Leibniz scholarship is a most thorough account of Leibniz's philosophical correspondencee. It both illuminates Leibniz's philosophical views and pays due attention to the dialectical context in which the relevant passages from the letters occur. The result is a book of enormous value to all serious students of early-modern philosophy and the history of ideas.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
2 Leibniz and His Master
3 A Philosophical Apprenticeship
4 The LeibnizFoucher Alliance and Its Philosophical Bases
5 Leibniz to Arnauld
6 Leibniz and Fardella
7 Leibnizs Exchange with the Jesuits in China
8 Leibnizs Close Encounter with Cartesianism in the Correspondence with De Volder
Other editions - View all
abstract aggregate animate Antoine Arnauld argued argument Aristotelian Aristotle Aristotle’s Arnauld bodily substance body Bosses Caroline Caroline’s Cartesian China Chinese Christian Wolff claim Clarke composite substance conceived corporeal substance Cudworth derivative force Descartes Descartes’s discussion doctrine dominant monad entelechy entity Essay exchange existence experience explain extended mass extended substance Fardella Foucher GP II GP VII Hanover ideas issue knowledge Lady Masham Leibniz wrote Leibniz’s correspondence Leibniz’s letter Leibniz’s philosophy Leibniz’s view Locke Locke’s Malebranche matter mechanical mechanical philosophy metaphysics Michelangelo Fardella mind monadology monads motion nature necessary truths Newton ofthe Oldenburg ontology passive forces passive powers perception phenomena philosophical physical Platonic primitive active primitive force principle question reality reason reformed philosophy relation reply response Royal Society scholastics seems Simon Foucher simple substances soul substantial form suggests Theodicy theory Thomasius Thomasius’s thought true unities understanding vinculum Volder Wolff writes