Handbook of Organizational JusticeJerald Greenberg, Jason A. Colquitt Matters of perceived fairness and justice run deep in the workplace. Workers are concerned about being treated fairly by their supervisors; managers generally are interested in treating their direct reports fairly; and everyone is concerned about what happens when these expectations are violated. This exciting new handbook covers the topic of organizational justice, defined as people's perceptions of fairness in organizations. The Handbook of Organizational Justice is designed to be a complete, current, and comprehensive reference chronicling the current state of the organizational justice literature. Tracing the development of ideas regarding organizational justice, this book: *introduces the topic of organizational justice from a historical perspective and presents fundamental issues regarding the nature of organizational justice; *examines the justice judgment process, specifically addressing basic psychological processes, such as the roles of control, self-interest, morality, and trust in the formation of justice judgments; *discusses the consequences of fair and unfair treatment in the workplace; *focuses on such key issues as promoting justice in the workplace in ways that help manage stress, and the underlying processes that account for the effectiveness of justice applications; *examines the generalizability of the interaction between process and outcomes and focuses on the notion of cross-cultural differences in justice effects; and *summarizes the state of the science of organizational justice and presents various issues for future research and theorizing. This Handbook is useful as a guide for professors and graduate students, primarily in the fields of management and psychology. It also is highly relevant to professionals in the fields of communication, sociology, legal studies, marketing, and human resources management. |
Contents
1973 | |
1990 | |
Are Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice Conceptually Distinct? | |
Ambrose and Anke Arnaud | |
How Should Organizational Justice Be Measured? | |
The Justice Judgment Process | |
What Is the Role of Control in Organizational Justice? | |
Shapiro and Jeanne M Brett | |
Blader and Tom R Tyler | |
How Can Justice Be Used to Manage Stress in Organizations? | |
Riël Vermunt and Herman Steensma | |
Stephen W Gilliland and Jeff M S Hale | |
Eugene F StoneRomero and Dianna L Stone | |
Ramona Bobocel and Agnes Zdaniuk | |
How When and Why Does Outcome Favorability Interact with Procedural | |
Joel Brockner and Batia Wiesenfeld | |
Jennifer Z Gillespie and Jerald Greenberg | |
Robert Folger Russell Cropanzano and Barry Goldman | |
What Is Responsible for the Fair Process Effect? | |
Kees Vanden | |
Donald E Conlon Christopher J Meyer and Jadyn M Nowakowski | |
Where Do We Stand? | |
Author Index | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Academy of Management allocation Applied Psychology assess Behavior and Human Bies Blader Bobocel Brockner Colquitt conceptual context Cropanzano cultural deontic distributive and procedural distributive justice employees equity theory evaluations example explanations fair process effect fairness heuristic theory fairness judgments fairness perceptions fairness theory favorability and procedural Folger Gilliland goal Greenberg Human Decision Processes individuals influence informational justice injustice interactional justice interpersonal justice Journal of Applied Journal of Personality justice judgments justice literature justice perceptions justice research Konovsky Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Leung Leventhal Lind Management Journal measure mediators moral Organizational Behavior organizational citizenship behavior organizational justice organizations out-group outcome favorability participants performance Personality and Social perspective power distance procedural and distributive procedural fairness procedural justice reactions relational model relationship responses role self-interest Shapiro Skarlicki social exchange social exchange theory Social Psychology stress suggests supervisor Thibaut trust Tyler unfair variables Vermunt workplace