Page images
PDF
EPUB

TABLE OF CANADIAN CASES

REPORTED AND NOTED IN THIS VOLUME.

Abell v. Parr, 136.
Agnew v. Plunkett, 158.
Allan v. McTavish, III.
Allen v. Lyon, 393.
Allen v. Mathers, 79.
Anderson v. Jellett, 241.
Anderson v. Woolers et al., 16.
Archer v. Severn, 349.
Arkell v. Grigor, 234.
Armstrong v. Forster, 371.
Arnoldi v. O'Donohoe, 54.
Awberry v. McLean, 335.

Badenach v. Slater, 91.
Bain v. City of Montreal, 224.
Bank of British North America v.

Eddy, 158, 192.

Bank of Montreal v. Perkins, 225. Bank of Nova Scotia v. La Roche, 252.

Canada Atlantic Ry. Co. and Town

ship of Cambridge, 315.
Canadian Bank of Commerce v.
Woodward, 76.

Canada Landed Credit Co. V.
Thompson, 92.

Canavan v. Meek, 227.
Carey v. City of Toronto, 276.
Carnegie v. Federal Bank, 354.
Cartwright v. Hindes, 246.
Chapman v. Smith, 33.

Chapman v. Tufts et al., 53.

| Doyle v. Bell, 32.
Driscoll v. Green, 293.

Duff v. Canadian Mutual Fire Ins.
Co., 37, 137.

Dumble v. Dumble, 111.
Dunford v. Dunford, 171.

Dunlap v. Dunlap, 251.

Dunn v. Board of Education of
Town of Windsor, 350.

Eager v. Johnstone, Re Eager, 98.
Eaton v. Storer, 98.

Edwards v. Morrison, 229.

Choate v. Turner, Reg. ex rel., 133. Edwards v. Pearson, 231.

Christie v. Conway, 253.

Christopher v. Noxon, 56.
Church v. Fuller, 96.

Citizens' Ins. Co. v. Parsons, 16.
Clarke v. Corporation of the Town
of Palmerston, 276.
Clarke v. Darvagh, 349.

Bank of Ottawa v. McLoughlin, Clark v. Union Fire Ins. Co., 363.

294.

Clarkson v. White, 17.

[blocks in formation]

Cochran v. Boucher, 247, 402.
Coghill v. Clark, 116.
Cole v. Campbell, 236.
Colthart, Re, 60.

Compton v. Preston, 135.
Corporation of Ancaster v. Durand
et al., 33.

Bennett v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co., Corporation of Dundas v. Gilmour

249.

Bingham v. Henry, 223.
Birkett et al. v. McGuire et al., 275.
Black v. Strickland, 96.
Blainey v. McGrath, 209.
Bolton v. Rowland, 351.
Bothwell Election Petition, 233,401
Boyd v. McNutt, 211.
Boys' Home v. Lewis, 139.
Bradford, In re, 369.
Bradley v. Clarke, 80, 192.
Breckenridge v. Ontario Loan and
Deposit Co., 140.

Brine v. Beddome, Reg., ex rel. 116.
Brine v. Booth, Reg., ex rel 116,

244.

Brown and Binkley, 259.

et al., 137.

Cotton Co. v. Canada Shipping Co.
223.

Coughlin v. Clark, 245.
County of Bruce v. McLay, 245.
Coulson v. Spiers, 233.
Court v. Holland, 77.
Cowan v. Pesserer, 230.
Craig, Re., 317.

Crathern v. Bell, 91.
Crozier v. Alkenbach, 79.
Culham v. Stuart, 334.
Cummins v. Low, 138.

Darling v. Cullatton, 317.
Darling v. Darling, 329.
Deckie v. Woodworth, 171.
Demorest v. Midland Ry. Co., 394.
Devanney v. Brownlee, 92.

Building and Loan Association v. Devanney et al., v. Dorr, 399.

Brown v. Brown, 367.

Bucke v. Murray, 233.

Heimrod, 254

Burdett, Ae (a solicitor), 158.

Burk v. Brittain, 74.

D'Hormus Gee & Co. v. Grey, 98.
Dickson v. Murray, 211.

Emerson v. Niagara Navigation
Co., 138.

Emery v. Emery, 58.
English v. Glen, 98.
Erie Stewart, In re cargo, II.
Evans v. Watt, III.

Exchange Bank v. Newell et al. 253.

Falkiner v. Grand Junction Ry. 230.
Fargey v. Grand Junction Ry. 400.
Farmer v. Livingstone, 52.
Farmer v. Tribune Printing Co.,
371.

Ferris v. Farris, 115, 371.
Fire Ins. Ass'n et al. v. Canada
Fire and M. Ins. Co., 136.
Flanders v. D'Evelyn, 97.
Fleming v. Dick, 290.
Fleming v. McNab, 294.
Fletcher v. Noble, 253.

Foley v. Canada Permanent L. &
S. Co., 232.

Foley v. Murray, 151.

Foot Price, 392.

Forrester v. Thrasher, 29.

Frechett v. Goulet, 51.

Gage v. Canada Pub. Co., 55, 75.
Gallagher v. Glass, 33.

Garland v. Omnium Sec. Co., 395.

Garrett v. Roberts, 381.

Garson v. Garson, 247.

Gibson v. Midland Ky. Co., 242.
Giles v. Morrow, 15.
Gilroy v. McMullen, 296.
Giraldi v. La Banque Jacques
Cartier, 225.

Gooderham v. Toronto & Nipissing
Ry. Co., 92.
Gough v. Bench, 37.

Direct Cable Co. v. Dominion Tel- Graham v. Ross, 371.

[blocks in formation]

Grand Junction Ry. Cc. v. County
of Peterboro, 50, 316.

Grand Trunk Ry. Co. v. Ontario
& Quebec Ry., 115.
Grand T'k Ry. Co. v. Wilson, 224.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

McNab v. Peer, 35.

McNamara v. McLay, 295.

McPherson v. Gedge, 400.

McKea v. White, 242.

Nasmith v. Toronto, Reg. ex rel., 93
Nevin v. Pulman Palace Car Co.,
164.

Maw v. Township of King and North of Scotland v. Beard, 252.
Northwood v. Raleigh, 17.

Albion, 171.

Meek v. Scob 11, 394.

Merchants Bank v. Hancock, 334.

Merchants Bank v. Huson, 353.

Merchants Bank v. Moffatt, 174.

Meriden v. Lee, 35.

Metropolitan Soc. for prevention of

Cruelty to Animals v. Ander

son, 152.

Middlesex Election Petition, 317.
Midland Ry. Co. v. Onta io Roll-

ing Mills Co.. 31.
Midland Ry. Co. of Can. & Town-

ship of N. Gwilliambury, 347
Midland Ry. and Township of Ux-

bridge and Thorah, 330, 347.

Milan v. Tramway Co., In re, 99.

Miles v. Cameron, 235.

Miller v. Brown, 54, 233.

Miller v. Pilling, 110.

Miller v. Hamilton et ux, 93.

Mitchell v. Cameron, 240.

Mitchell v. Sykes, 275.

Monaghan v. Dobb us, 261.
Monkhouse v. G. T. Ry. Co., 348.
Moore v. Central, &c., Ry. Co, 348
Morrison v. Taylor, 212.
Morton v. rand Trunk Ry. Co.

353, 373.

Mundell v. Tink ns 333-

Munsie v. Lindsay, 286.

Murphy v. G. T. Ry. Co., 29.
Murray v. McCallum, 172.
Myers v. Kendrick, 60, 262.

McCann v. Chisholm, 137.
McCaughey v. Walsh, 156.
McCleneghan v. Grey, 173.

[blocks in formation]

Paradis v. Campbell. 394.
Paris Manufacturing Co. v. Walls,
395.

Park v. St. George, 17.
Parsons v. Queens Ins. Co., 30.
Pere Adams v. Corporation of East
Whitby, 208.

Philp v. Municipality of Reach, 335

Phipps, Re, 110.

Phoenix Mutual Ins. Co. v. Deans,
308.

Platt v. Attrill, 348.

Poucher v. Donovan, 97, 114.

Powell v. Peek, 294.

Prescott E ection Petition, Inse, 60

Purdy v. Parks, 157.

Pyatt v. McKee, 243.

Queen v. Gough, 249.

Queen v. Mead, 50.

Quinlan v. Union Fire Ins. Co., 93,

Vardon v. Vardon, 229.

Victoria Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v.
Davidson, 250.

Simpson and The Judge of C. C. of Victoria Mutual v. Freel, 352.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Torrance v. Livingstone, 352.

Totten v. Bowen, 76.
Trotter v. Chambers, 226.
Trust & Loan Co. v. McCarthy, 188.
Turner v. Lucas, 29.

Union Ins. Co. v. Fitzsimmons, 32.

Union Ins. Co. v. Shields, 32.

Union Ins. Co. v. O'Gara, 399.

Young, Re, 193.

TABLE OF CASES

REPORTED AND NOTED IN THIS VOLUME IN "RECENT ENGLISH DECISIONS" "RECENT ENGLISH PRACTICE CASES."

AND

[blocks in formation]

Biggs v Peacock, 145.

Bishop Auckland Local Board v
Bishop Auckland Co., 105.
Blaiberg v Parke, 103.
Bleckley, 361.

Bolckow & Co. v Fisher, 143.
Brewer v Broadwood, 90.
Britain v Rossiter, 274.
Brown v Collis, 313.

Cahill v Cahill, 322.
Campagnie Financiere v Peruvian

Guano Co., 274. Canada Central R. Co., v Murray, 324.

Chamberlain v Boyd, 359.
Chapman v Biggs, 273.

Cooke v Newcastle Water Co.,207.
Croggan v Allen, 89.

[blocks in formation]

Harris v Jenkins, 206. Humphreys v Green, 106.

Jacobson, Ex parte, Re Pangoffs, 145.

Joy v Hadley, 208.

Kearsley v Philips, 69. Kennedy v Lyell, 347.

¦ Pangoffs, In re, ex parte Jacobson, 145.

Parker v Felgate, 361.
Peareth v Marriott, 107.
Penrice v Williams, 346.
Popple v Sylvester, 89.

Pott v Brassey, Re Allnutt, 126.

Randle v Payne, In re Payne, 346.
Raymond v Tapson, 206.

Kent v Worthing Local Board, 105. Read v Anderson, 104.
Knight v Gardner, 273.

Lamb v Munster, 104.
Lee and Hemingway, In re, 313.
Lees v Fisher, 145.
Loosemore v Tiverton and North
Devon R. R. Co., 86.
Lydney & Wigpool Iron ore Co. v
Bird, 347.

Mayor of Swansea v Thomas, 70.
Mersea Steamship Co. v Shuttle-
worth Co., 389.
Miller v Brash, 105.
Miller, in the goods of, 360.
Mullens v Miller, 123.

Regina v Bradlaugh, 183.
Ridler v Ridler, In re Ridler, 88.
Russell v Davies, 273.

Sir W. Hart Dyke, Ex parte, 146. Smith v Watts, In re Watts, 70. Spence v Metropolitan Board of Works, 107.

Thursby & Farists, In re Bradford, 369.

Tillett v Ward, 69.

Turner v Mason, In re, 273.

Munday v Thames Iron Works' Vivian v Little, 369.

Co., 103.

Munster v Railton & Co., 370.

McGowan v Middleton, 388.

Dyke, Sir W. Hart, Ex parte, 146. McHenry v Lewis, 145.

Elliott v Smith, 124.

Featherstone's Trusts, Re, 90. Francis v Hayward, 107.

New Callao, In re, 207.
Nichols v Evans, 208.
North London R. R. Co. v Great
Northern R. R. Co., 273.

Fraser v Cooper, Hall & Co., 273, Northwood v Township of Raleigh,

[blocks in formation]

Waddell v Fraser, 389.

Ward v Morse, In re Brown, 347.
Watkins v Rymill, 144.

Webb v Stenton, 272, 389.
Webster, Ex parte, 106.
Wilder v Pigott, 126.

Willoughby Osborne v Holyoake,

125.

Worcester City Banking Co. v. Blick, 125.

« PreviousContinue »