« PreviousContinue »
Now here is an apparent inconsistency; for it would appear from (61) and (62) that
sin-1 * +606-1 = Sande - Sen det = 0; (63) which result is not correct ; because sin- + cos->= : we
must therefore have recourse to the accurate process of definite integration; and let us take both integrals between the same limits; say, between the limits 0 and x; then by (11), Art. 5, po dx fir-x70_N
therefore by addition
(66) which is a correct result; (61) and (62) therefore are not simultaneously true in the forms of indefinite integrals.
1. dx 32.) Integration of
(2 ax — x2)
"versih ā (2ax-x2)1'
36.] The relations existing between some of these last integrals deserve consideration; for taking the definite integral of (69) between the limits x and 0, we have * dx
1x +(a? + x2),
(73) Jo (a? + x2) but the left-hand member may be put under the following form, whereby its integral is determined by equation (61): viz.
and the identity of (73) and (74) may thus be proved :
replacing sin (2 V-1) in terms of its exponential value as given
(75) a which shews that the two results though different in form are identical in value. Similarly might
might 22 I 2 be put in the form 1 fr d (x v 1)
-, and be integrated according to ✓-11. a? — (xv1)2' Article 15, and the result shewn to be equal to
(aza + b2 +c) whereby the integral is reduced to one or other of the forms (76) or (77). . dx
dix Ex. 1.
39.] The integration of (a? — x2) dx, and of (a +x2) dx.
In these cases it is convenient to employ the method of integration by parts given by the formula, Ju dv = wv – Svdu.
(78) To determine /(a? – x2)+dx.