Skeeles v. Shearley, 233. Skelton v. Robertson, 117, 300, 561. Slane Peerage Case, 178, 179. Staines v. Morris, 261, 265, 267, 541, 547. Standen v. Christmas, 386, 387. v. Ullithorne, 258. Small v. Atwood, 40, 44, 220, 221, 378, Stanwix's Case, 174. 468, 538, 548. Smart v. Sanders, 86. Smith, ex parte, 18, 338. in re, 275, 340. v. Baker, 384. v. Bowin, 489. v. Burnam, 146. v. Capron, 41, 207, 218, 530. v. Chichester, 314. v. Clarke, 89. v. Compton, 373, 375. v. Dimes, 342. v. East India Co., 84. v. Ellis, 48, 68. v. Garland, 462, 490. v. Henley, 111, 161, 453. v. Jackson, 81, 518. v. Keating, 420. v. Lloyd, 506, 517. v. Nelson, 563. v. Phillips, 430. Sneezum v. Marshall, 110. South Wales Railway Co., ex parte, 225. Southby v. Hutt, 58, 67, 146, 152, 217. Southwell v. Nicholas, 491. Stapylton v. Scott, 492, 531. -v. Dawber, 455, 456. Steed v. Calley, 12. v. Guppy, 165, 219, 264, 472, 532. v. Stevens, 395, 396. Steward v. Bridges, 624. Stewart v. Alliston, 56, 63, 504. Stilwell, or Stillwell v. Mellersh, 568. Stirke, in re, 341. Stokes v. Moore, 106, 108. -- v. Russell, 362. Stone, 274. v. Commercial Railway Co.. 98. Story v. Lord Windsor, 390. Stourton, Lord, v. Meers, 495. Stowell v. Robinson, 213. Stratford v. Bosworth, 543. -v. Twynam, 19. 272. | Street, in re, -v, Brown, 454. Stronghill v. Buck, 253. Stuart, ex parte, 263. Southcomb v. Bishop of Exeter, 88, 212, Stubbs, in re, 270, 272. Souter v. Drake, 137. 222, 515, 539. Sowarsby v. Lacy, 285. Sparke v. Montriou, 201. v. Sargon, 570. Stuckey v. Drewe, 398. Sturge v. Starr, 352. . Sturge v. Sturge, 353, 357. v. Southcote, 425. Swift v. Davis, 439. Symons v. James, 48, 51, 73. Talbot v. Ford, 492. -- v. Smith, 72, 446, 456. Tarback v. Marbury, 425. Tardiffe v. Scrughan, 349. Tasker v. Small, 30, 115, 388, 466, 467. Tawney v. Lynn and Ely Railway Co., 98. Taylor, ex parte, 275. in re, 337. v. Ashton, 46. v. Martindale, 51, 530. v. Salmon, 84, 467. v. Stibbert, 408, 415, 416. v. Tabrum, 29, 35, 37. Tebbott v. Voules, 123. Teed v. Carruthers 347. Templer v. Sweet, 555, 556, 557. Thames Haven Co. v. Brymer, 449, 450. 29. Thomas v. Blackman, 98, 104, 478. v. Dering. 71, 464, 499, 502. v. Gwynne, 538, 569. v. Phillips, 20, 543, 545. -- v. Powell. 381. Thompson, in re, 341. v. Blackstone, 491. - v. Simpson, 394, 404. Thomson v. Miles, 211, 457. v. Thomson, 490. Thornbury v. Bevill, 105, 107. Thornett v. Haines, 51, 89. Thornhill v. Glover, 571. v. Thornhill, 556. Thorneley, app. Aspland, resp. 113. Thynne, Lady v. Earl of Glengall, 478. Tilsley, ex parte, 557. Tipping v. Power, 565. Toft v. Stephenson, 114, 190, 198, 346. Tomlins v. Tomlins, 177. Tomlinson v. Manchester and Birming- Townsend v. Champernowne, 131, 133, 470, 542, 544, 547. Townshend, Marquis of, v. Stangroom, Trefusis v. Lord Clinton, 295, 566. Trevelyan v. Charter, 23, 377, 535. Trimlestown, Lord, v. Kemmis, 161. Trinity House, Corporation of, ex parte, 337. Trower v. Newcombe. 44. Tunstall v. Trappes, 232, 233, 400, 402. v. Doe dem. Bennett, 191. v. Harvey, 46, 510. v. Richardson, 37. v. Trelawny, 16, 19, 23. Turquand v. Vanderplank, 396. Twining v. Morrice, 90, 492, 504. Tyler v. Beversham, 304, 352. Tyrconnel, Earl of, v. Duke of Ancaster, 56. Vernon v. Thellusson, 560. Vigers v. Pike, 354, 380, 510, 512. Wace v. Bickerton, 374. Wakeman v. Duchess of Rutland, 469, 537. Waldron v. Forester, 295. Walker, in re, 295. v. Aston, 568. v. Barnes, 70, 503. v. Earl Beauchamp, 179. v. Eastern Counties Railway Company, 98, 460. v. Jeffreys, 210. 215. v. Moore, 447. Wall v. Bright, 124. v. Stubbs, 510. Wallis v. Harrison, 430. Walond v. Walond, 556, 557, 559. Walsh v. Trevanion, 414. Walsingham, Lord, v. Goodricke, 415. Walter v. Maunde, 41: Walters, in re, 342. v. Jackson, 569. v. Pyman, 530, 540. Waltham, Lord, Case of, 523. -- v. Earl of Stamford, 417. Walwyn v. Coutts, 420. Warburton v. Farn, 35. v. Loveland, 401, 402. Ward, ex parte, 311. v. Cooke, 536, 558. v. Trathen, 149, 562. Wardle v. Carter, 355, 357. Warn v. Bickford, 370. Warren v. Richardson, 218, 531. Waterford, Marquis of, v. Knight, 182. Watling v. Horwood, 110. v. Cresswell, 394. v. Toone, 17. Way, ex parte, 272. Webb v. Russell, 364. Webber, ex parte, 271. v. Jones, 568. Webster v. Birchmore, 173. Wedderburn v. Wedderburn, 26. Welcome v. Upton, 161, 167, 185. ton, 188. in re, 340, 342. West v. Reid, 158, 165, 406, 407, 411, 412. v. Vincent, 559. Westby v. Westby, 357. v. Russell, 103, 106, 499, 500, Wethered v. Wethered, 385. Whichcote v. Bramston, 355. Whitbread v. Jordan, 151, 206, 317, 409, Whitchurch v. Whitchurch, 128. Whitcomb v. Foley, 530. v. Minchin, 18. Whitcombe, ex parte, 341. White v. Bartlett, 81. v. Cuddon, 49, 53, 65, 78, 463, v. Damon, 510, 511. v. Lisle, 167. v. Wakefield, 350, 411. Whitmel v. Farrel, 497. Whitworth v. Gaugain, 237, 325, 299. Whittle v. Henning, 464. - v. Hawker, 185. Wigg v. Wigg, 115, 390. Wild v. Lockhart, 565. Wilde v. Gibson, 45, 354, 379, 380, 413, 472. Wildgoose v. Wayland, 402, 403. Wilding v. Andrews, 564. v. Richards, 420. Wilker v. Bodington, 392. Willan v. Willan, 492. Willes v. Levett, 128. Willey v. South-Eastern Railway Company, 225. Williams, ex parte, 274. v. Attenborough, 551, 557, 559. Willoughby v. Backhouse, 455. v. Willoughby, 390, 391. Wills v. Stradling, 477, 478, 479. v. Clapham, 294, 306, 542. v. Knubley, 376. v. Rastall, 414. v. Short, 113. v. Tummon, 86, 87. v. Wilson, 420. Wiltshire v. Rabbits, 229, 393. Winch v. Winchester, 308, 486, 542. Winter v. Lord Anson, 310, 345, 347, 348, 350, 370. v. Blades, 297. v. Vizitelly, 545. Winterbottom v. Ingham, 119, 120, 222, 448, 522, 523. Wise v. Wise, 412. Withy v. Cottle, 209, 460, 520.. Wood v. Abrey, 353, 355, 359. v. Griffith, 501. v. Harman, 291. v. Lake, 92. v. Lambirth, 272. v. Marquis of Londonderry, 417, 419. Wood v. Machu, 212, 520. v. Patteson, 2. v. Wand, 184. v. White, 30, 465, 467, 533. Woodall, in re, 274. Woodman v. Higgins, 205. v. Titterton, 523. Woods v. Woods, 390. Woodward v. Miller, 50, 57, 89, 546. Worley v. Frampton, 38, 78, 261. v. Morgan, 206, 317, 345, Wray v. Steele, 435. v. Dannah, 83, 84. v. Howard, 309, 504, 545. v. Maunder, 32, 35, v. Smythies, 162. v. Snowe, 395, 629, 643. Wrightson v. Hudson, 325, 400. Morgan, 495. Wynne v. Griffith, 132, 418. A COMPENDIUM, &c. &c. CHAPTER I. AS TO RESTRICTIONS ON THE GENERAL CAPACITY TO 1. As to who are generally incompetent to sell. THE questions who may sell, and who may buy, real estate, may be conveniently discussed, by assuming the existence of a general capacity to enter into the relation of vendor or purchaser; and by then treating of the exceptions to the general rule. Chapter 1. to sell or buy Incapacities to sell or buy, may be considered as of two Incapacities descriptions; 1st, such as depend on some circumstance are personal to the proposed vendor or purchaser, and affecting his general capacity to buy or sell any real estate: general and, 2ndly, such as depend on the relation in which he or relative. stands to the particular property proposed to be sold or bought; or to the party with whom he purposes to deal. (1.) As to incapacities to sell of the 1st description. are generally to sell. [*2] A proposed vendor, although having a good title to, as to who and being the absolute owner of property, and standing incompetent in *no situation of trust towards the proposed purchaser, may yet be under some personal incapacity, which may prevent a sale: that is to say, he may be, 1st, An infant: if so, he can, as a general rule, execute no conveyance Infants. |