Page images
PDF
EPUB

before the time proper for such an argument | tions and behaviour of the witnesses against

[ocr errors]

Alt. Gen. If they will call their witnesses, let them; or if they say they have none, then they may make their observations upon the evidence; but else we desire we may be kept to the usual method of proceedings.

Mr. Phipps. With submission, we thought it fit to know the opinion of the court first, if there be two witnesses against the prisoner; for if there be not two-witnesses, as the law requires, we need not trouble the court with our evidence.

Sir B. Shower. Then, my lord, we must desire that the record may be read of captain Porter's conviction of manslaughter; a man that has been guilty of doing such an act, feloniously, maliciously and voluntarily, as that is, sure is not a competent witness.

Cl. of Ar. It has been read already. Att. Gen. I thought we had been over that objection before.

Sir B. Shower. We think it is proper for us to move it now again; for though it is no objection to his being a legal witness, yet we hope it will influence his reputation as to his credit; for he that has been guilty of killing a man in such a manner as the indictment lays it, will find but little credit, we hope, with a jury of countrymen. But since it has been read, and your lordship and the jury have taken notice of it, we will call some other witnesses as to Mr. Porter's reputation and behaviour, we think they will prove things as bad as an attainder. 1 shall not open them to your lordship, but beg leave to call our witnesses, who will acquaint you what they have to say.

Att. Gen. Certainly, my lord, you will not think fit to let them do so. I desire they would not usher in any thing of evidence without acquainting the court what they call them for For that were the way to let them in to call witnesses to things that are not proper.

L. C. J. Nay, without doubt it is not regular to produce any evidence, without opening it. Att. Gen. For if it be for any crime that a man may be presented for, and there is no conviction; I think that ought not to be given in evidence to take away a witness's credit: If it be only to his general reputation and behaviour, so far they may go, and we cannot oppose it. Therefore I desire sir Bartholomew Shower will open to the court of what nature his evidence is.

Sir B. Shower. Well, I will tell you then what I call them to.

L. C. J. You must tell us what you call them to.

Sir B. Shower. Why then, my lord, if robbing upon the highway, if clipping, if conversing with clippers, if fornication, if buggery, if any of these irregularities, will take off the credit of a man, I have instructions in my brief, of evidence of crimes of this nature, and to this purpose against Mr. Porter; and we hope that by law, a prisoner standing for his life is at liberty to give an account of the ac¿VOL. XIII.

him. I know the objection that Mr. Attorney makes, a witness does not come prepared to vindicate and give an account of every action of his life, and it is not commonly allowed to give evidence of particular actions; but if those actions be repeated, and a man lives in the practice of them, and this practice is continued for several years, and this be made out by evidence; we hope no jury that have any conscience, will upon their oaths give any credit to the evidence of a person against whom such a testimony is given.

Mr. Phipps. We are speaking only, my lord, to the credit of Mr. Porter; and if we can shew by evidence that he is so ill a man as to be guilty of those crimes that we have opened, according to the instructions in our brief, we hope the jury will not think him fit to be a good evidence against us in this matter. L. C. J. What say you to this, Mr. Attorney?

Att. Gen. My lord, they themselves know, that this sort of evidence never was admitted in any case, nor can be, for it must tend to the overthrow of all justice and legal proceedings; for instead of trying the prisoner at the bar, they would try Mr. Porter. It has been always denied where it comes to a particular crime that a man may be prosecuted for; and this it seems is not one crime or two, but so many and so long continued, as they say, and so often practised, that here are the whole actions of a man's life to be ript up, which they can never shew any precedent when it was permitted, because a man has no opportunity to defend himself. Any man in the world may by this means be wounded in his reputation, and crimes laid to his charge that he never thought of, and he can have no opportunity of giving an answer to it, because he never imagined there would be any such objection: It is killing a man in his good name by a sidewound, against which he has no protection or defence. My lord, this must tend to the preventing all manner of justice; it is against ali common sense or reason, and it never was offered at by any lawyer before, as I believe, at leastwise never so openly; and therefore I wonder that these gentlemen should do it, who acknowledge, at least one of them did, that as often as it has been now offered it has been over-ruled; and I know not for what end it is offered, but to make a noise in the court: They know that it is irregular as much as any thing that could be offered.

There

Sol. Gen. Indeed, my lord, if the prisoner at the bar had offered this matter, it had been excusable; but that gentlemen of the long robe, and who are so well acquainted with the practice of the courts of law, should pretend to do such a thing, is unaccountable. was somewhat like this that was offered at Manchester, but that was by the prisoner, to prove that one Lunt who was a witness had two wives, and they brought a copy of an indictment upon which there was no process; P

after that they endeavoured to prove him guilty of several robberies; but all that sort of evidence was refused. I only give them this instance to shew, that where the prisoner has attempted it, it has been always rejected; and I am sure they cannot shew me that ever it was allowed, even to the prisoner himself, to give any thing of this kind in evidence; and this I must say, they can never shew me any one particular instance, when counsel ever endeavoured to do it, before this time.

Sir B. Shower. My lord, I mentioned the particular crimes, the faults which I had in my instructions to object against the credit of the testimony of capt. Porter, in answer to Mr. Attorney's desire, that I would open the particulars of the evidence, that I would call my witnesses to the truth of it; I was loth to repeat the words, I think the things themselves so abominable; but we conceive, with submission, we may be admitted in this case to offer what we have offered. Suppose a man be a common, lewd, disorderly fellow, one that frequently swears to falshood for his life: We know it is a common rule in point of evidence, that against a witness you shall only give an account of his character at large, of his general conversation; but that general conversation arises from particular actions, and if the witnesses give you an account of such disorderly actions repeated, we hope that will go to his discredit, which is that we now are labouring for, and submit it to your lordship's opinion whether we may not do it.

L. C. J. Look ye, you may bring witnesses to give an account of the general tenour of his conversation, but you do not think sure that we will try now at this time, whether he be guilty of robbery or buggery.

guilty of in court, I mean of the intended assassination.

Mr. Phipps. No, we agree we cannot; but pray let us prove him guilty of as many crimes as we can.

Sol. Gen. But, my lord, I hope you will keep them to the general question of the common ordinary tenour of his conversation. Sir B. Shower. Call Mr. Oldfield, Mr. Nicholas, Mr. Milford, Black Will.

[Mr. Milford appeared. Cryer. Lay your hand on the book. The evidence that you shall give on behalf of the prisoner at the bar shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So help you God.

Sir B. Shower. Pray will you give my lord and the jury an account whether you know captain Porter, and how long you have known him?

Milford. I have known him about four years. Sir B. Shower. What reputation is he of? Milford. I never knew any hurt by him in my life.

Sir B. Shower. Pray what is your name? Milford. Frederick Milford.

Sir B. Shower. But the name in my brief is John Milford, that is my man.

L. C. J. But you see this man knows him.
Sir B. Shower. Call Mr. Oldfield.

[Which was done, and he appeared accord. ingly.]

Mr. Phipps. Do you know captain Porter? Oldfield. Yes, I do.

Mr. Phipps. How long have you known him?

Oldfield. I believe about twenty years. Mr. Phipps. Pray will you give my lord and the jury an account of his life and conver

Sir B. Shower. My lord, we will give you an account that he used to have a private lodg-sation. ing, and come in with his horse tired, and several other such things, as that he used to go out in disguises, and the like.

Mr. Phipps. My lord, I cannot imagine why a man that has been guilty of any such crimes, and is not taken, should be of greater credit than a man that has been taken and punished.

L. C. J. What is that you say, Mr. Phipps? Mr. Phipps. My lord, I say it is the crime that renders a man infamous, and I do not know why a man that has had the good fortune not to be taken and punished for great crimes by him committed, should be in a better condition as to the credit of his testimony, than one that is taken and undergoes the punishment of the law.

Sol. Gen. Mr. Charnock urged that as far as it would go, but we are obliged, it seems, to hear things that have been over-ruled over and over; but I desire to know of them, whether they can shew he has been guilty of a greater crime than he has confest himself

See Peake's Law of Evidence, chap. 3, Witnesses, sect. 2, art. General Character.

Oldfield. I can say nothing, he was always civil in my company, but he was lewd in his

discourse.

Sir B. Shower. What do you mean by being lewd in his discourse?

Oldfield. Why, he would be talking very extravagantly.

Mr. Phipps. What do you mean in talking? Was it of what he had done himself, Sir?

Oldfield. No otherwise than that he had whored, and those kind of things.

Sir B. Shower. What other things beside whoring?

Oldfield. I know no other part of it.

Sir B. Shower. Where is Edward Bouchey? (He did not appear.)

Mr. Phipps. Call William O'Bryan. (He did not appear.)

Sir. B. Shower. Where is Mr. Page, and Mr. Hardiman?

(None of them appeared.) Cryer. There is not a man of them here, Sir.

Sir B. Shower. Mr. Webber, Do you know where they are, for the court stays for them.

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

Mr. Webber. Indeed I do not, they were summoned to be here.

Sir B.Shower. Where is Black Will? Cryer. Black Will. (He appeared, and was a Moor.)

therefore, as Mr. Porter tells you, to determine that difficulty, there were several men sent, whereof he was one; Knightley another, and King a third, to view the ground on both sides the water, and to make their report: the ground being viewed, and the report made to

L. C. J. Ask him if he be a Christian. Cryer. I have asked him, and he says he is some of their accomplices, who to receive it a Christian.

(Then he was sworn.)

L. C. J. Well, what do you ask him? Rookwood. Will, Pray give an account of your master, and of his life and conversation. Mr. Phipps. You are sworn to tell the truth, sweet-heart.

met at the Nag's-Head in Covent Garden, which was about the tenth or twelfth of February last; it was then agreed that the king and his guards should be attacked on this side the water, about Turnham-Green.

Mr. Porter has told you, that at several meetings for the carrying on this design, the prisoner Mr. Rookwood was present, more particularly at the Globe Tavern in Hatton-garden,

Will. I served him almost eight years, and he has been a very good master to me, mywhere were also sir George Barcley, Mr. lord.

Sir B. Shower. What do you know him to be guilty of?-Will. Nothing at all.

Sir B. Shower. I believe they have put in these men to confirm his reputation.

L. C. J. Indeed, I think the king's counsel should have called these witnesses, if there had been occasion.

Charnock, sir William Parkyns, himself, and others, and there they did enter into a consult how they might assassinate the king; and it being proposed, Mr. Rookwood did not like it, as Mr. Porter says, but said it was a desperate attempt; and thereupon sir George Barcley pulled out a scheme that he had, and shewed it at that time to Mr. Rookwood, and said, you are sent over from France, and are to obey my orders, and you are to command a party; and then Mr. Rookwood made an answer in French, There's an end of it,' 'which, as he says, im

Sir B. Shower. We submit it to your direc-
tion, how far this evidence will affect him;
there is nothing said, as we apprehend, that will
amount to treason; if the prisoner has a mind
to say any thing himself, we hope your lord-ports a consent.
ship will please to hear him.

L. C. J. Aye, if he will, let him.
Rookwood. My lord, Mr. Porter does not
say, that I consented to command a party.
L. C. J. Is that all you have to say? Then,
Gentlemen, will you sum up?

Mr. Conyers. My lord, we are agreed; we submit to the court on both sides.

L. C. J. Then, gentlemen of the jury, the prisoner at the bar, Mr. Rookwood, is indicted for high-treason, in compassing, imagining, and intending the death and destruction of the king, by a most barbarous and wicked assassination; you have had an account of this design from two witnesses that have been produced; the one is captain Porter, the other is Mr. Harris, who swear they were both concerned as actors in it.

Then at another time, which was the Saturday morning the 15th of February, they met at captain Porter's lodging, and there was a discourse about going on to put the design in execution; and one Durant, one of the men that was to watch the king and the guards going out at Kensington, came in, and the question was, whether they should go that day upon the design? They had discourse about it, and Mr. Rookwood the prisoner was there present, and there did not appear any dissent in him to the prosecution of the design, but it seems it was readily agreed among them, to pursue it according to the former determination.

Then the next witness that is produced is Mr. Harris, who gives you a large account of the beginning of his knowledge, and of his Captain Porter tells you, about the latter end being concerned in this matter; he tells you of January, or the beginning of February last he was in France, and at the court of St. Gersir George Barcley came over into England mains, where the late king then was, and that from France; and there was a former design he spoke with him, and where was also coto murder the king; and after several meet-lonel Parker; and king James took notice of ings and conferences among the conspirators, him and of his faithful service, and told him, they came to a resolution that he should be as- he always designed him a kindness, and then sassinated; but which way to effect it, ad- had opportunity of doing it, and said he would mitted of a dispute among them; for the king send him over into England, where he should as you have heard, going frequently, about be subsisted, and directed him to obey the once a week, a hunting on the other side the orders of sir George Barcley; and there being water near Richmond, the design was first to one Hare by, who was to come over with him, assassinate him at Richmond Park, or there- king James gave them both names of disguise abouts, as he returned from hunting, and pre- which they were to go by in England, and, as paration was made accordingly; but that not it seems, others that came over did also assume; being so fully agreed upon, the conveniency of for Mr. Rookwood went by the name of Rothe place held still some debate; for some were berts, Harris was to go by the name of Jenof opinion, that it was better to make the at-kins, and Hare by the name of Guiney; they tempt on this side the water, than on the other; were directed to apply themselves to sir George

Barcley, and had directions how they should, Which shews not only his knowledge of the find him, which were to go into Covent-garden, design, but his being engaged in the prosecuin the evening, upon a Monday or a Thursday tion of it. and if they saw a person that had a white handkerchief hanging out of his pocket, they were to take notice of him to be sir George Barcley, and they had ten lewis d'ores a-piece for their journeys to carry them off; and you have heard from whom they had them; and they were told, that if at Calais they were kept longer than they expected, whereby their money was spent, care was taken that they should be supplied from the governor of Calais, the president there; and it seems Mr. Harris and Mr. Hare went together to Calais, and lay a considerable time for want of a wind, whereby their money fell short of defraying their expences; but they were afterwards supplied by the governor of Calais, according as was proised at St. Germains.

Gentlemen, he tells you, that after they came into England, the first time they went to seek sir George Barcley, was upon the Monday night, but they did not find him at that time; but afterwards they met with him, and Mr. Harris had subsistence-money from him, according to king James's promise, which was at the rate of 5s. a-day, when he had no horse, and afterwards when he had a horse; at 6s. a-day; this is the accouut he gives you how he came over, and of his journey and meeting with sir George Barcley.

And now he comes to speak particularly concerning the prisoner at the bar, Mr. Rookwood :| He tells you, that on Saturday morning the 15th of February, the first day when this assassination was designed to be committed, he went to the lodging of one Burk, where Mr. Rook wood was, with others, and he found them all in a great disorder; and thereupon he asked them, what was the matter, and what they were going to do? And Rookwood bid him go to one Counter, and he should know of him what was the matter; accordingly he went to his lodging, and Counter told him and those who were with him, that they must get ready to go to Turnham Green; and at the same time and place he met with sir George Barcley, and after some discourse of attacking the coach, sir George Barcley at the first said, they were his janizaries; and afterwards going out, he came in again and said, they were men of honour, and that they were to go abroad to attack the prince of Orange,

The next day, or a little time after, Mr. Harris met with Mr. Rookwood, and enters into discourse with him to this effect: What! are we sent over to murder the prince of Orange? It is a strange sort of employment: (for it seems they were not informed in France what they were to do here, but they were to put themselves under the conduct of sir George Barcley, and obey his orders) Mr. Rookwood said, he was afraid the thing was so, and that they were drawnin; but said, If he had known of the design before-hand, he would not have come over, but have begged the king's pardon.

And then, Gentlemen, you are told further, That upon the going out upon Saturday the 220, which was the second time it was to have been put in execution, there was a list of men that Mr. Rookwood gave to Mr. Harris of several names that he has mentioned to you; he says, Mr. Rookwood's name was at the top, as one that was to command the party, and the name he went by was Roberts; and there was Harris's counterfeit name, which was Jenkins; and Hare's counterfeit name, which was Guiney; and they were to make ready to go to Turnham-Green. He told him, there was a list, and that he and Harris was to be of his party, that he was to attack the prince of Orange, and that Mr. Harris should be his aid de camp.

Gentlemen, I forgot to tell you, That between the first Saturday and the second, Mr. Harris, Mr. Rookwood, and Mr. Lowick, walking in Red-Lyon-Fields, and there in discourse among themselves, Mr. Harris and Mr. Rookwood did express themselves to be much concerned that they were to be employed upon such a design as this was, which they owned to be very barbarous; but Mr. Rookwood and Lowick said, They were under command, and must ohey orders, though Mr. Rookwood did not like the design they were engaged in.

Gentlemen, they have told you of horses that were placed at Somerset-house in a stable there, under the care of Mr. Lewis, my lord Feversham's gentleman of the horse, about six or seven horses, and those six horses that were there at that time were afterwards taken away; but that is only a circumstance.

So that, Gentlemen, this is now the sum and substance of this evidence that has been given you, as far as it relates to the prisoner: his counsel in his defence have insisted upon several things; in the first place, though it was last mentioned in time, yet it ought to have the first consideration; the counsel for the prisoner have endeavoured to take off the credit of Mr. Porter, and have opened indeed very great crimes that he should be guilty of, which must render him a person not to be believed, but they have not proved any thing; no witness that they have called against Mr. Porter says the least against him to invalidate his testimony, or to induce you to disbelieve what he has said.

Then they say in point of law, There is no overt-act proved of any design against the king's life that affects Mr. Rookwood; now that matter you are to consider of, whether or no it does appear by the testimony of two witnesses, that Mr. Rookwood was concerned in this design of assassinating the king: captain Porter is positive that be was at the consult at the Globe-tavern, where it was proposed, debated, and resolved upon; but Mr. Rookwood says, he did dislike it; so says captain Porter, he did not approve of it at the first upon his being acquainted with it; but being sent over to obey the orders of sir George Barcley, and sir

[ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

George Barcley producing a scheme ready drawn, wherein he was to command the party, telling him, that he must obey orders. You hear what he said, and the answer he returned in French, There is an end of it; whether that does not amount to a consent and agreement to be engaged in this design, is left to your consideration; for if it do, it is plainly an overt-act. Then, Gentlemen, you hear further, that Harris was told by Mr. Rookwood, that he should be of his party, and be his aid du camp, and go to Turnham-Green to attack the prince of Orange, and he had a list of men given him by Rookwood, and was directed to get the rest ready.

Rookwood. That was not in the indictment. L. C. J. But you were at that meeting, which is laid in the indictment.

Rookwood. My lord, that list is not in the indictment; the list in the indictment refers to Mr. Cranburne.

mitted in any trial as in this, and now particularly to break in upon the court in the midst of the charge.

L. C. J. Nay, nay, if there be any mistake, let us hear them, that it may be rectified. L. C. J. Treby. I think we should receive them, to try if they can make it out. But the objection I do not very well understand yet; for, as I take the matter to stand, it is alledged in the indictment, that they had prepared men and arms, and horses, for the execution of this design. Now is it not reasonable, or can there be any thing more proper, than to give in evidence, and prove that the prisoner had, and delivered to some of the complices, a list of those men that were to do it? Why, it proves the very thing alledged; but let us see whe ther it be so.

L. C. J. No, but that is an evidence of your being in the design; I hope that list of men will be some evidence of the consent and agree-. ment that Mr. Rookwood was to command a party.

Sir B. Shower. With submission, my lord, the words of the act seem otherwise, and that no overt-act should be given in evidence, that is not expressly alledged.

L. C. J. But cannot there be one act, that may be proof of another act which is al edged? Sir B. Shower. Then there is no advantage of this law; for, my lord, the end of the act was, That they should know the particular 'crimes that they were to answer to.

L. C. J. That could never be the end of the law, that all particular facts that are but evidence of the facts alledged should be set forth in the indictment; it was sufficient before the act, to alledge any overt act; and any other overtact, though not alledged, and had no relation to the overt-act that was alledged, yet if it were to the same sort of treason, might be given in

evidence.

Sir B Shower. The law says, Ye shall not give evidence of any overt act that is not expressly mentioned.

L. C. J. It is not urged as an overt-act, but as evidence of an overt-act that is alledged; for instance, the overt-act alledged is, that they did meet and consult, shall not they give in evidence what was said and done at those meetings, though not alledged? Sir George Barcley produced a scheme at the Globe-tavern, sbail not the producing of that scheme be given in evidence? If it may, why not the giving the list to Harris?

Mr. Phipps. My lord, it is plain it was Mr. Attorney's opinion, it could not be given in evidence, unless it was alledged in the indictment; because he has particularly alledged the list in Cranburne's case, in this very indictment.

Sol. Gen. I know not what those gentlemen mean by this sort of practice; certainly there never were so many irregularities com

Sir B. Shower. My lord, there is no such thing alledged.

L. C. J. That is strange! pray see if it be in the indictment.

• Conveniebant, Clerk of Arr. (Reads.) proposuerunt, tractaverunt, consultaverunt, 'consenserunt, et agreaverunt, ad ipsum Docutiendum, Anglice to assassinate,' interfici'minum Regem nunc ex Insidiis et Dolo perendum, et murdrandum; et ad execrabilem, ‹ horrendam, et detestabilem Assassinationem, 'Anglice Assassination,' et interfectionem postea scilicet eisdem Die et Anno, ac diillam citius exequendum et perpetrandum, versis aliis Diebus et Vicibus, apud Parochiam prædictam in Comitatu prædicto, prodi'torie tractaverunt, proposuerunt, et consultaverunt de Viis, Modis et Mediis, ac Tempore et Loco, ubi, quando, qualiter et quomodo 'dictum Dominumn Regem sic ex Insidiis fa'cilius interficerent; et consenserunt, agrea' verunt et assenserunt, quod quadraginta Homines equestres aut eo circiter, quorum 'iidem Christophorus Knightley, Robertus Cranburne forent quatuor, et quilibet horum Lowick, Ambrosius Rookwood et Carolus 'proditorie super se suscepit esse unum, cum 'Bombardis, Sclopis et Sclopetis, Pulvere 'bombardico et Globulis plumbeis oneratis, et 'cum Gladiis, Ensibus et aliis Armis armati insidiati forent, et essent in Subsessu, An

6

glice in ambush,' adundem Dominum Regem in Rheda sua, Anglice his coach,' existentem, quando foris iret invadendum; quodque quidam et competens Numerus de Hominibus illis sic armatis in Satellites, Anglice the guards,' ipsius Domini Regis eum 'tunc attendentes et secum existentes aggressi 'forent, et eos expugnarent et devincerent, 'dum alii eorundem Hominum sic armatorum 'ipsum Dominum Regem percuterent, inter'ficerent, occiderent et murdrarent.'

[ocr errors]

Mr. Conyers. And, my lord, there is evidence of some of these forty men, whose names were given in a list by Rookwood to Harris?

Mr. Phipps. But now, in Cranburne's part, the list is expressly alleged as an overt- act,

« PreviousContinue »