Condensed Reports of Decisions in the Supreme Court of Ohio, Volume 1

Front Cover
 

What people are saying - Write a review

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

Good resource for information on the lawsuits against John Cleves Symmes relating to the land grant known as Symme's Purchase in Ohio.

Contents

Burget
75
Douglas r Waddle 182 1 413
78
Smith r Cincinnati
79
Edwards
85
Coats Lessee of Lindsley v 115 1 243
115
Hampson Campbell v 57 1
119
Hunt
122
Hart Norton v 73 1 157
129
The Commissioners of Montgomery county
131
Symmes et
138
Holcomb Dawson v 134 1 275
144
Carlton et al Buttles v 22 1 32
150
Harness
167
McDougal et al v Holmes et
169
Agnew
171
Harness Ayres v 107 1 368
172
Worthington 185 1 423
185
Agnew Innes v
202
Forman Smurr v
204
Crebill Turner v 167 1 372
210
Daily Lessee of Atkinson r 326 2
212
Waddle Douglass
217
Armstrong et al Emerick v
218
Coit Nowler et al v 220 1 519
220
Ruffin Pancoast et al v
225
Morris Edwards v
226
Stephenson 232 2 8
232
Budd
236
Alexander
238
McCloud Mors v
239
Alexander Townsend v
240
Parsons Smith v
242
Wilson 214 2 27
244
Prait et
247
Conant Knaggs v 243 2 26
250
Williams et
252
McConnell Hammer v
254
Carpenter
261
Williams Taylor v
298
Crary et al v Williams et al 254 2 65
306
Worthington Steele et al v
314
Vantyle
321
Hallock et
324
Fitch r Dunlap
328
Deforest Lessee of Bentleys Heirs v 329 2 221
329
McGuire Lessee of Ely v
330
Bank of Steubenville 334 2 229
334
McConnell 246 2 31
335
Mattox
336
Lessee of McCulloughs heirs v Rodrick
337
The heirs of Ludlow
345
Wilson Vancleve v
349
Matthews Davis v
353
Markle Lessee of Spencer v
356
Brown 357 2 267
357
Stewart Lambo
359
Lepper et
368
Porter Lessee of Dawson v
371
Starling o Buttles
372
Alexander McCormick v
373
Matthews 352 2 257
375
Coil Dorflinger v 375 2 311
378
Rodrick Lesse of McCulloughs heirs v
382
Thompson Beggs v
383
Courcier et al v Graham 384 2 351
384
Doyle Conn v 378 2 318
385
Sarchet o Sarchet
386
Commissioners of Brown County v Butt 390 2 348
390
Beam et
410
Phillips Loines et al
414
Ex Co v Gilmore
426
Phoebus et al McArthur v
434
Dodge et al Green v 436 2
436
Sheriff of Pickaway co Patton
437
Hamm Slaughter v 359 2 271
442
Shultz Bank U States
444
Dudley et al v Little et al 445 2 504
445
Smiley r Wright et
450
Cantfield Fobes et al 455 3 17
455
Stiver
456
Roe v
460
Bank U States
462
Reed Barret v
465
Hunt et al v Yeateman 454 3 15
467
Adams et al 545 3 223
545
Hibbard Ohio v 471 3 63
546
Mills et al Lockwood et al v
560
Sinnard o McBride
564
Trustees of Sec 16 v Miller
565
Rider Polls v
566
Wilkins r Phillips
568
Adams et al Cass v
574
Dixon et al v Ewing 575 3 280
575
Hemphills heirs Lessee of Ilolts heirs v 551 3 232
578
Perrin et al Hubble v
580
Delarack et
582
Street o Francis
584
Zane
589
Vangundy
590
Delarack et al Wilson v 582 3 290
594
Huntington et ux Winthrop 597 3 327
597
St Clairs heirs et al u Smith et
606
Patterson et al Richmond v
608
Chillicothe
609
Thompson et al Lessee of Matthews v
615
Cunningham Strum v 579 3 286
618
Wells et al v Wilson et
622
Askew Lessee of Gray v
630
Dodge et al Green v 638 3 486
638
Allen Rogers et al v
639
Wallace
640
McIntire Young et ux d
645
Sewell
653
Cooper Wills v 638 3 486
656
Neil
660
Park Lessee of Ludlows heirs v
699
Rayberg et al Fowble v
706
64
713
Dabney et
716
The same c Sherman et
718
Vattier
722
Ex Co v Turpin et
724
Robinson Holmes v
740
Walker Fowble
748
Critchfield et al Bush et al v 736 4 103
752
Kenny King v
754
Turpin et al Mi Ex Co v
758
Phillips Loines et al v
764
Murphy Lessee of Miller et al v
773
Stewart et al o Treas of Champaign county
775
Bigalow
779
Kounts et
780
Waters et al v Lemmon
781
Dunn et al Parker v 783 4 232
783
Brandon et
787
Cowles Butler v 779 4 205
789
Wallace o The Ohio In
792
Kidd et al Ludlows heirs v
798
French et
807
Todd et al Ohio v
820
Dayton Overseers Jordan v 800 4 294
828
Tom a colored Boy v Desha
830
Root
831
May r Babcock et
838
Root Watkinson v
842
Avery v Ruffin
844
Monahon Fulton v
849
Roe Doe v
852
Davis
854
Poundsford
859
Tappan
860
Pounsford Wolf v
862
Allen Dennison v
864
Roe 850 4 435
866
Methodist Church et
869
Edwards Morris v 85 1 189
881
Gibson et al Lessee of Thompson v
885
Long et al Lessee of Massies heirs v
886
Bitzer 262 2 89
889
Oosterout 611 3 381
893
Loines et al v Phillips
896
Hall Lessee of Bisbee i 627 3 413
899
Norton Treasurer of Champaign county v
900
Norton Lessee of Curtis v
906
Williams et al Aspinwall v
909
Winans 504 3 135
913
Woodyear Gardener v
919

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 740 - It is sufficient for the present to say, generally, that when the importer has so acted upon the thing imported that it has become incorporated and mixed up with the mass of property in the country, it has, perhaps, lost its distinctive character as an import, and has become subject to the taxing power of the state...
Page 188 - His lordship then proceeded to say that the dependence or independence of covenants was to be collected from the evident sense and meaning of the parties, and that however transposed they might be in the deed, their precedency must depend on the order of time in which the intent of the transaction requires their performance.
Page 115 - ... may be conveyed by lease and release or bargain and sale signed, sealed and delivered by the person being of full age in whom the estate may be and attested by two witnesses...
Page 115 - August following; with an appendix of resolutions and the ordinance for the government of the territory — by authority. Cincinnati, 1796. ["Maxwell's Code."] — Laws of the territory of the United States north west of the river Ohio...
Page 122 - And the said records and exemplifications, authenticated as aforesaid, shall have such faith and credit given to them in every court and office within the United States, as they have by law or usage in the courts or offices of the state from whence the same are or shall be taken.
Page 359 - Now, the condition of the above obligation is such, that if...
Page 115 - ... the French and Canadian inhabitants, and other settlers of the Kaskaskies, Saint Vincents, and the neighboring villages, who have heretofore professed themselves citizens of Virginia, their laws and customs now in force among them, relative to the descent and conveyance of property.
Page 117 - ... any interest in or concerning them, or upon any agreement that is not to be performed within the space of one year from the making thereof, unless the agreement upon which such action shall be brought, or some memorandum or note thereof, shall be in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith...
Page 35 - After all the evidence had been submitted, the defendant below asked the court to instruct the jury that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover because...
Page 343 - AB as for his costs and charges by him about his suit in that behalf expended...

Bibliographic information