The Invention of the Eyewitness: Witnessing and Testimony in Early Modern FranceIn an examination of eyewitness travel writing in thirteenth- through sixteenth-century France, Andrea Frisch studies the figure of the witness at a historical juncture and in a cultural context in which that figure is generally thought to have begun to assume a recognizably modern form and function. Whereas most accounts of early modern travel literature tend to read modern presuppositions about witnessing and testimony back into the material, Frisch approaches the early modern witness in terms of the cultural legacy of the Middle Ages. Through primary readings in law and theology, Frisch documents the tension between the ethical witness (the characteristic witness of premodernity) and the epistemic witness (the modern witness) and explores the impact of that tension on the figure of the witness in pre- and early modern French-language travel literature. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 5
Page 91
6 For an overview of the historical evolution of the oath in various Western legal
systems from Greco - Roman antiquity to the present , see H . Silving , “ The Oath
. ” ? A more concise description of the sixteenth - century criminal inquest can be
...
6 For an overview of the historical evolution of the oath in various Western legal
systems from Greco - Roman antiquity to the present , see H . Silving , “ The Oath
. ” ? A more concise description of the sixteenth - century criminal inquest can be
...
Page 117
The Roman source had said only that témoins instrumentaires surpassed the
written act they had witnessed ; but the superiority of witnesses ments went
beyond a purely ideological attachment to juridical tradition 117 CHAPTER
FOUR: THE ...
The Roman source had said only that témoins instrumentaires surpassed the
written act they had witnessed ; but the superiority of witnesses ments went
beyond a purely ideological attachment to juridical tradition 117 CHAPTER
FOUR: THE ...
Page 118
In this period , writes Lévy , the legists simply adopted the principle to all
occasions , and considered Roman cases where written proof was represented
as preferable to witness testimony as so many exceptions to the general rule that
posited ...
In this period , writes Lévy , the legists simply adopted the principle to all
occasions , and considered Roman cases where written proof was represented
as preferable to witness testimony as so many exceptions to the general rule that
posited ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | 9 |
THE WITNESS AND THE JUDGE | 21 |
ETHOS | 41 |
Copyright | |
3 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
according accused allowed appears audience authority bear become body Calvin Catholic chapter Christian cited claim considered context contrast course courts credibility culture deposition describes discourse distinct early encounter epistemic essay establish ethical Eucharist European evaluating experience eyewitness fact faith first-person firsthand folklaw France French function give given hand Histoire inquest inquisitional Jean judge juridical knowledge language Léry Léry's longer Mandeville means medieval Montaigne Moreover narrative narrator nature ness never notes oath objections oral original Pantagruel particular party person perspective Polo Polo's position potential practice present procedure qu'il question readers record refer Relation represented rhetoric seen sense signs simply sixteenth century status story studies suggests testi testify testimony Thevet things tion truth ultimately voyage witness witness's World writing written