The Invention of the Eyewitness: Witnessing and Testimony in Early Modern FranceIn an examination of eyewitness travel writing in thirteenth- through sixteenth-century France, Andrea Frisch studies the figure of the witness at a historical juncture and in a cultural context in which that figure is generally thought to have begun to assume a recognizably modern form and function. Whereas most accounts of early modern travel literature tend to read modern presuppositions about witnessing and testimony back into the material, Frisch approaches the early modern witness in terms of the cultural legacy of the Middle Ages. Through primary readings in law and theology, Frisch documents the tension between the ethical witness (the characteristic witness of premodernity) and the epistemic witness (the modern witness) and explores the impact of that tension on the figure of the witness in pre- and early modern French-language travel literature. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 18
Page 62
This opening phrase , then , has the effect of controlling and containing , within
the language of the story itself , the encounter between the “ gentlemen ” of the
audience and the chroniques . A third relationship , that of narrator to story world ,
is ...
This opening phrase , then , has the effect of controlling and containing , within
the language of the story itself , the encounter between the “ gentlemen ” of the
audience and the chroniques . A third relationship , that of narrator to story world ,
is ...
Page 68
Despite his claim to have been Pantagruel ' s companion , Alcofribas does not
appear as a character inside the story he is telling until chapter seventeen ,
where we find him walking down the streets of Paris with Pantagruel ' s friend ,
the ...
Despite his claim to have been Pantagruel ' s companion , Alcofribas does not
appear as a character inside the story he is telling until chapter seventeen ,
where we find him walking down the streets of Paris with Pantagruel ' s friend ,
the ...
Page 73
But this summary is somewhat misleading . The story it tells is not exactly the
story that Alcofribas tells us . The triumphant conquest of the Almyrodes is never
actually reported – much less described in any detail – by our intrepid narrator .
But this summary is somewhat misleading . The story it tells is not exactly the
story that Alcofribas tells us . The triumphant conquest of the Almyrodes is never
actually reported – much less described in any detail – by our intrepid narrator .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | 9 |
THE WITNESS AND THE JUDGE | 21 |
ETHOS | 41 |
Copyright | |
3 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
according accused allowed appears audience authority bear become body Calvin Catholic chapter Christian cited claim considered context contrast course courts credibility culture deposition describes discourse distinct early encounter epistemic essay establish ethical Eucharist European evaluating experience eyewitness fact faith first-person firsthand folklaw France French function give given hand Histoire inquest inquisitional Jean judge juridical knowledge language Léry Léry's longer Mandeville means medieval Montaigne Moreover narrative narrator nature ness never notes oath objections oral original Pantagruel particular party person perspective Polo Polo's position potential practice present procedure qu'il question readers record refer Relation represented rhetoric seen sense signs simply sixteenth century status story studies suggests testi testify testimony Thevet things tion truth ultimately voyage witness witness's World writing written