| United States - 1821 - 470 pages
...occurred in some of our own that might rival thin clerical libeller: Brougham applied to the court for a rule to show cause why a criminal information should not be filed against the Rev. R. Blacow, HA He made this motion upon the affidavit of A. Miller of Liverpool, who swore that,... | |
| English literature - 1827 - 594 pages
...particular :— COURT OF KINO'S BENCH, NOV. 7. " CRIMINAL INFORMATION. — Mr. Goulburn applied to the Court for a rule to show cause why a criminal information should not be filed against the Rev. Jas. Roberts, of Hartshill, in the county of Warwick, a magistrate of that county ; and the ground... | |
| Edmund Burke - History - 1820 - 894 pages
...King v. Joseph Taylor and John Earnshaw. — Mr. Scarlett rose and said, he was instructed to move for a rule to show cause why a criminal information should not be filed against Joseph Taylor and John Earnshaw. He made this motion upon the affidavits, of John Mcllor, constable... | |
| Great Britain. Parliament - Great Britain - 1817 - 822 pages
...contradiction or explanation ; but it appeared of sufficient weight to the court, to induce them to grant a rule to show cause why a criminal information should not be filed : and, if the facts stated be true, there cannot be exhibited a stronger instance of the imprudence... | |
| William Forsyth, Sir Hudson Lowe - 1853 - 552 pages
...St. Helena,' that a fifth edition had already then appeared. When the Solicitor-General rose to move for a rule to show cause why a criminal information should not be granted against Barry Edward O'Meara for the libels he had published against Sir Hudson Lowe in his... | |
| Herbert Newman Mozley - Law - 914 pages
...Division for a mandamus to thr justices to grant a summons, or for a rule calling upon the party chargtni to show cause why a criminal information should not be filed against him. II. FINAL EXAMINATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS. NOVEMBER, 1884. (i.) PEELIMINAEY. A. What is now... | |
| Asia - 1821 - 650 pages
...when a rule which had been obtained against the Editor of that paper was made absolute. The rule was to show cause why a criminal information should not be filed against him for a libel. It was not opposed, and it is understood that the prosecution is not to be carried... | |
| |