| Law reports, digests, etc - 1909 - 956 pages
...that the evidence warrants the finding of the jury of negligence on the part of the railroad company, and that there was no contributory negligence on the part of the driver of the team. ID. — CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE NOT MATTER or LAW. — Held, that there was no... | |
| Railroad law - 1925 - 470 pages
...found that the accident was caused by the negligence of the appellant in placing the cars as it did, and that there was no contributory negligence on the part of the deceased, and there being evidence on which these findings could be made, this Court should not disturb... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1919 - 242 pages
...car or have gone behind the cart, but a collision occurred. Held, that the defendant was negligent, and that there was no contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. CURRIE & MUBRAY p. RIMMER, 1918 WALR 19. [Western Australia.] Contributory negligence—... | |
| United States - 1941 - 1626 pages
...Agency that the driver of the National Youth Administration truck may be reasonably found to have been guilty of negligence, and that there was no contributory negligence on the part of Hughey Parsley. As Mr. Parsley's claim for property damage is being settled administratively, the only... | |
| Iowa. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1905 - 960 pages
...performing the operation of putting in a new punch ; that plaintiff had no knowledge of this danger ; and that there was no contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff, because he had no knowledge of the danger, and had reason to suppose that, if the levers... | |
| Australia. High Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1911 - 818 pages
...; that the horse had escaped from a safe and secure paddock where it had been put by the plaintiff; and that there was no contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. Upon these findings the Judge entered judgment for the plaintiff for £41 with costs. The... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1889 - 984 pages
...there was evidence of negligence on the part of the porter, which was properlysubmitted to the jury, and that there was no contributory negligence on the part of the boy. It cannot be doubted that in this case the law required that the question of the plaintiff's contributory... | |
| |