...do this would prejudice the lien of the plaintiff's attorney. Reg. Gen. Hil. 16 Viet. s. 63, is that "no set-off of damages or costs between parties shall...suit, awarded to the adverse party, may be deducted (a)." In Scott v. Count de Richebourg (b) Maule J. says, that " interlocutory costs" are all the costs...

...hold to be no waiver of the plaintiff's right to these costs (Bentley v. Dames, 10 Exch. 347). 63. No set-off of damages or costs between parties shall...suit, awarded to the adverse party, may be deducted. As to setting -off interlocutory costs, see Melville v. Leeson (LJ 27, QB 318). The cases relating...

...jurisdictions makes no difference. By Reg. Gen. Hil. 2 W. 4. rule 93 (see 3 B. §• Ad. 388), "No set off of damages or costs between parties shall be allowed...to the prejudice of the attorney's lien for costs iu. the particular suit against which the set-off is sought, provided, neverthe- 1862. less, that interlocutory...

...jurisdictions makes no difference. By Reg. Gen. Hil. 2 W. 4. rule 93 (see 3 B. §• Ad. 388), " No set off of damages or costs between parties shall be allowed to the prejudice of the attorney's lieu for costs in the particular suit against which the set-off is sought, provided, neverthe- 1862....

...that of the King's Bench, by the adoption of Stg. Gen. So. 93, which provided that no set-off should be allowed to the prejudice of the attorney's lien for costs in the particular suit, except that interlocutory costs in the suit might be deducted. Jtrv. Rules, 86 ; 3 Earn, cfc Ad., 888...

...shall be deemed necessary for proceeding in the taxation of costs, or of an attorney's bill. 336-7 336 allowed to the prejudice of the attorney's lien for costs in the Tidd'n Prwtiw. particular suit against which the set-off is sought, provided, 8thp^iu 9t^d'L nevertheless,...

...year 1832, the practice was made uniform ; and at the present time no set-off of damages or costs is allowed, to the prejudice of the attorney's lien for...particular suit against which the set-off is sought, except as to interlocutory costs in the same suit, (y) In the different States of the Union, the practice...

...an issue which was afterwards held bad upon demurrer (Oienham v. Smythe, 10 WR649, Ex. ET 1862). 63. No set-off of damages or costs between parties shall be allowed to the prejudice of the attorney's lieu for costs in the particular suit against which the setoff is sought; provided, nevertheless, that...

...interlocutory costs'' within the meaning of the 93d rule of Hilary Term, 2 Wm. 4, which declares that, " No set-off of damages or costs " between parties shall...suit, awarded to the adverse party, may be deducted ;" and they may be set off against each other without regard to the attorney's lien (Scott v. De Richcbourg,...

...to the course of the Court. 117. No set-off of damages or costs between parties shall be Set-off not allowed to the prejudice of the attorney's lien for costs in the p^ud^'of particular suit against which the claim of set-off is made ; pro- Attorney1* videcl, nevertheless,...