 | Alfred Hix Welsh - English literature - 1880 - 182 pages
...why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone ? Why is it not as admissable in the second case, as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, viz : that, wheu we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone) that its several... | |
 | Alfred Hix Welsh - English language - 1882 - 1108 pages
...have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone? Why is it not as admissible in the second case, as...For this reason, and for no other, viz: that, when wo come to inspect the ivatch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone) that its several... | |
 | Harvey Goodwin - Nature - 1883 - 340 pages
...have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone ? Why is it not as admissible in the second case as in the first ? For this reason and for no other, namely, that when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
 | Alfred Hix Welsh - English language - 1882 - 1134 pages
...have always been there. Yet why should not tins answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone? ,— A # , thi* reason, and for no other, viz: that, when we conn- to inspect the watch, we perceive (what \ve... | |
 | Samuel Butler - Biology - 1911 - 702 pages
...have been always there. Yet, why should not this answer servo for the watch as veil as for the stone? Why is it not as admissible in the second case as...For this reason, and for no other, viz. that when wo come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the •tone) that iU seTeral... | |
 | Methodist Church - 1849 - 720 pages
...very easy to show the absurdity of this answer. But suppose I had found a watch upon the ground, and when we come to inspect the watch we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone) that the several parts are framed and put together for a purpose, — for example, that they are so formed... | |
 | Samuel Butler - Epic poetry, Greek - 1924 - 426 pages
...have been always there. Yet, why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone? Why is it not as admissible in the second case as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, vi%., that when we come to inspeft the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone)... | |
 | Alvin Plantinga - Philosophy - 1977 - 132 pages
...have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch, as well as for the stone? Why is it not as admissible in the second case, as in the first 7 For this reason, and for no other, viz., that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what... | |
 | Martha McMackin Garland, Martha M. Garland - Education - 1980 - 216 pages
...had before given . . . Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone; why is it not as admissible in the second case as in the first? . . . This mechanism being observed - it requires indeed an examination of the instrument, and perhaps... | |
 | Kelly James Clark - Philosophy - 1990 - 172 pages
...have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone? why is it not as admissible in the second case as...reason, and for no other, viz., that, when we come to 13- Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. NK Smith (New York: St. Martin's, 1965), A 623,... | |
| |
I knew the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone; why is it not as admissible in the second case as in the first? For this reason, and for no other... 
