...preceding estate, if that estate shall never take effect, the remainder over will nevertheless take effect, the first estate being considered only as a preceding limitation, and not as a preceding condition. Without, however, relying on any rule of construction, we cannot doubt, that the intention of the testator...

...ed., it is said, " Where a devise is upon a condition annexed to a preceding estate, that is, where it is made after a preceding executory or contingent...condition to give effect to the subsequent limitation." And again, page 237, "As an instance of that class where subsequent estates were limited on a conditional...

...Sourendro was to take a life interest. The estate to the Son of Joteendro was only to arise on the EE contingency of a Son being born or adopted. It is...delivering the opinion of the Court in Gulliver v. Wickett, said : " That the limitation over was good ; that the devise to the infant being ineffectual...

...effect on a condition annexed to any preceding estate, If the preceding estate should never arise, the remainder over will nevertheless take place; the...condition to give effect to the subsequent limitation. Norris v. Beyea, 13 NY 273, 287. Where there was a devise and bequest to the testator's son of real...

...non-existence of such devisee, the consequence is the same,) the remainder over will nevertheless take effect; the first estate being considered only as a preceding...condition to give effect to the subsequent limitation. 1 Fearne, Rera. 510-513; 1 Pow. Dev. 196-202, and notes; Redf. Wills, (1st Ed.) pt. 2, p. 595. For,...

...nonexlstence of such devisee, the consequence Is the same), the remainder over will nevertheless take effect, the first estate being considered only as a preceding...condition to give effect to the subsequent limitation. * * * For, as was declared by Lord Hardwicke, in Avelyn v. Ward, 1 Ves. Sr. 420: 'If the precedent...

...preceding estate, if that estate shall never take effect, the remainder over will nevertheless take effect, the first estate being considered only as a preceding limitation, and not as a preceding condition. Without, however, relying on any rule of construction, we can not doubt, that the intention of the...

...take effect on a condition annexed to a preceding estate, if the preceding estate should never arise the remainder over will nevertheless take place, the...considered only as a preceding limitation and not as a condition. So in case of a devise to A for life and on his death to В or in case of B 's death before...

...preceding limitation or contingent estate never should arise or take effect, the remainder orewill, nevertheless, take place ; the first estate being...condition to give effect to the subsequent limitation."' And again (page 237), " As an instance of that class where subsequent estates were limited on a conditional...

...non-existence of such devisee, the consequence is the same,) the remainder over will nevertheless take effect; the first estate being considered only as a preceding limitation, and not as »preceding condition to give effect to the subsequent limitation. 1 Fearne, Rem. 510-513; 1 Pow. Dev....