...inter-State commerce in the sale of the product, but predicated its decision upon the statement that "there was nothing in the proofs to indicate any intention...might be indirectly affected was not enough to entitle complainants to a decree." To at least one of the justices (Mr. Justice Harlan) this reason seemed...

...that monopolies in the manufacture of a necessary of life are not covered by the act, the court says : "There was nothing in the proofs to indicate any intention to put a restraint upon trade or commerce." Note the word "intention," for its use in this connection seems to indicate that, if there had been...

...justify such a law. The point decided in United Mates v. EC Kniulil Co., 156 US 1, 17, was that "the fact that trade or commerce might be indirectly affected was -not enough to entitle complainants to a decree." Commerce depends upon population, but Congress could not, on that ground,-...

...in the manufacture of the commodity, but not through control of interstate or foreign commerce;" " there was nothing in the proofs to indicate any intention to put restraint upon trade or commerce." So, conceding the existence of a monopoly in manufacture is established...

...contrary, it says ' every ' and ' any part.' " Citing a previous judgment of the Court which said "the fact that trade or commerce might be indirectly affected...was not enough to entitle complainant to a decree" (United States v. EC Knight Co., 156 US), the judgment continued : " Commerce depends upon population,...

...though, in order to dispose of the product, the instrumentality of commerce was necessarily invoked. There was nothing in the proofs to indicate any intention...might be indirectly affected was not enough to entitle complainants to a decree. The subject-matter of the sale was shares of manufacturing stock, and the...

...article and its price may, notwithstanding the monopoly, remain unaffected. In that case it was said, '"There was nothing in the proofs to indicate any...intention to put a restraint upon trade or commerce." But this cannot be said of a combination of manufacturers in one state who agree to arbitrarily increase...

...such a law. The point decided in United States v. EC Kniyht Co., 156 US 1, 17, was that " the fact that trade or commerce might be indirectly affected was not enough to entitle complainants to a decree." Commerce depends upon population, but Congress could not, on that ground,...

...when the article or product passes from the control of the State and belongs to commerce. And again : There was nothing in the proofs to indicate any intention...might be indirectly affected was not enough to entitle complainants to a decree. Again, the court said (p. 16): Contracts, combinations, or conspiracies to...

...though, in order to dispose of the product, the instrumentality of commerce was necessarily invoked. There was nothing in the proofs to indicate any intention...might be indirectly affected was not enough to entitle complainants to a decree. The subject-matter of the sale was shares of manufacturing stock, and the...